NewsEpisodesStoreForumPMStatsiTunes Chat
Login / Register

\"You can\'t prove God doesn\'t exist!\"

Back to Topics  |   [ 1 ] ... [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] ... [ 15 ]
Add Post
ULTRADUDE0
#241   Posted 3 months ago, in reply to post #1 by HenrikssonReply
this is the most ridiculous thing ever... I disproved a bunch of those things! What proof do you have that there is a god? You can't just make up figures and say that it's true. I'm not atheist but come on, you can do better than that if you want people to be the same religion as you.

And oh yes

[ FRENCH TOAST STICKS! ]
YG117
#242   Posted 3 months ago, in reply to post #239 by ZairakReply
I understand what you are saying, and the best proof that we catholics can give is by simply looking at the world around us, miracles, and other things in life. But many people just don't want to see God through those things, and instead look at science.
I wasn't offended. I was just concerned at what seemed to me like an irrelevant statement. I think I understand better now, and I have one more point to make: just because I don't think we have a purpose set out for us, doesn't mean I don't think we should try and achieve something with our lives. It's precisely because I don't think our lives have a predetermined meaning that I think we should try as hard as we can to find one for ourselves.
Now that you have explained, i understand hat you were going towards a lot better.
this is the most ridiculous thing ever... I disproved a bunch of those things! What proof do you have that there is a god? You can't just make up figures and say that it's true. I'm not atheist but come on, you can do better than that if you want people to be the same religion as you.
No one is trying to get anyone to believe in the same religion as each other, this is just a debate on the existance of God.
agrajagthetesty
#243   Posted 3 months agoReply
the best proof that we catholics can give is by simply looking at the world around us, miracles, and other things in life.
I'm sure if you already believe that God exists, you see evidence of him around because you believe he created everything. But to see the world as a miracle and hence evidence of God's existence, you first have to reject all other theories as to how it came about. The logic is entirely circular.
But many people just don't want to see God through those things, and instead look at science.
You've put your finger on an interesting point here: namely, the value religion puts on faith. I honestly don't mean to be disrespectful here, but I for one would rather look at science, where any new theory has to be put through rigorous testing before becoming generally accepted, than religion, which relies on faith and therefore by definition has no proof to support it. In short, I fail to see the value of faith.
notbrock
#244   Posted 2 months agoReply
about my last post: i forgot i even posted that! there is no logical proof in afterlife we only have our beliefs and ideals as guidelines. i don't know, i mean maybe i just lost respect for god seeing as all the shit that's been going on lately (can you say EMO!!). if we don't believe in god we have no hope but also we have no fear seeing as the right-wrong factor swims around his decision. but we all have the deep feeling of morality to what's right and wrong so we decide most of the time for ourselves. all in all what it really comes down to is belief no matter if it's real or not
agrajagthetesty
#245   Posted 2 months agoReply
if we don't believe in god we have no hope.
Sorry to sound immature, but says who? Have you ever lost faith (assuming you are in fact a theist, which I'm pretty sure you are)? Have you ever asked an atheist to explain their views on life? Have you ever been told by an atheist that losing their religion caused them to lose hope? Atheists have hope that life on this planet will improve- for them, for their loved ones and for living creatures in general- just as everyone else does. Not believing in an afterlife makes this sentiment that much more important.
Zairak
#246   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #244 by notbrockReply
Ah...I am not trying to be rude, but could you rephrase this post? I am having a difficult time understanding it.

Also, in regards to your earlier post...
i have a question: i know god exist but i want to know does he like to make people suffer for the 'bigger picture'? maybe that's a stupid question but i've asked it and nobody seems to be able to answer me. and also just to put it out there in case it was brought up or will be: there is an after life. there just has to be! what's the point of being created if all it's just suffering we have to endure.
I don't quite get what you mean by 'suffering'. I don't see any experience in life as 'suffering', you see. There are obviously experiences that should logically be avoided, such as death, but even pain is just an experience. Pain is also something to be avoided, of course, as it generally indicates something is wrong with your body, but it is not bad in and of itself. So, what suffering were you referring to?
killshot
#247   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #246 by ZairakReply
Cancer kinda sucks. I think I would call that suffering.
darkarcher
Moderator
#248   Posted 2 months agoReply
I don't normally post here, but here I go...

The current "suffering" condition of mankind, in the Christian worldview, is attributed to the corruption of the world due to the sin of humanity. Another common question is "Why does God let bad things happen to good people." The answer to this would be, once again, that it is merely the nature of the world for bad things to happen due to the nature of man.
Zairak
#249   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #247 by killshotReply
In that cancer is typically incurable and leads to death, yes, it does suck. However, again, pain is merely a sensation. It only has as much power as you give it.
The current "suffering" condition of mankind, in the Christian worldview, is attributed to the corruption of the world due to the sin of humanity. Another common question is "Why does God let bad things happen to good people." The answer to this would be, once again, that it is merely the nature of the world for bad things to happen due to the nature of man.
While you are correct from the Christian viewpoint, Notbrock seemed to be asking what the point to living and suffering would be if there was not an afterlife. I concluded from this that, in this scenario of useless 'suffering', there was no God to make an afterlife. After reading your post, I thought about it and I suppouse he could have meant a scenario in which God created us without an afterlife, but that doesn't make as much sense as my first conclusion. It would rather invalidate the teachings of an afterlife in the Bible in that scenario and that does not make sense if he is speaking from a Christian viewpoint.
killshot
#250   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #248 by darkarcherReply
it is merely the nature of the world for bad things to happen due to the nature of man.
But if God is responsible for creating humans, then he is also responsible for their nature. This would imply that the world we are currently living in is the world that God intended to create. The "sin of humanity" is just humans doing what comes naturally to them. If God didn't want humans to sin, then why are we born not only with the ability, but the desire to do so? Free will is the answer I always receive when I ask this question (even though free will and an omniscient being who controls the future cannot coexist) but freedom of choice is not the issue. Why do humans have such a strong, burning desire to do the things that God has told them not to do? It is as if the system is designed to send as many people as possible to hell.

Getting back to the original sin, why was it so blasphemous to eat from the tree of knowledge? Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the fruit from this tree give humans the ability to distinguish good from evil? This should be a desirable trait, not a sacrilegious one. And if this truly was a great sin and all the generations that follow Adam and Eve are punished for it, then why is the difference between right and wrong still so ambiguous? We are cursed to forever pay the price for this crime, yet we are no longer reaping the reward? I guess this whole argument boils down to why is our all loving God such a dick?
notbrock
#251   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #245 by agrajagthetestyReply
i didn't mean in hope that it'll all get better on earth! i was talking about afterlife.
notbrock
#252   Posted 2 months agoReply
and theist, yeah i am. never said i DIDN'T believe in god. just said i'm not willing to always suffer so others i don't even care about can have a good 'ol time doing whatever. trust me i'm the last person you should come to when asking to save the world...
notbrock
#253   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #246 by ZairakReply
nah i get you. i'm really lazy and i was like really tired when posting those (wonder why). suffring as in emosional suffering i suppose. sure, sure i get that my life isn't hanging from a string but no other person can know their own suffering better than any other.
to make it clear I AM NOT TRYING TO SOUND ALL 'I KNOW SHIT' HERE! i just have some opinions that like to stick their heads out once and awhile.
notbrock
#254   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #249 by ZairakReply
it just gives me the only "logical" reason to have a afterlife. moraly too yes but you try and figure out what's what.
"good people go to heaven and bad people go to hell" you can't really believe in this when looking at the current world. this 'suffering' (why everyone keeps putting that in brakets i do not know but now you got me doing it!) i speak of is to do with all kinds even though my own is emosional. i get by with my little obsessions and try to make sence of it all but i just can't see why god would want so many STUPID people to be happy (not litrally stupid but annoying and hurtful ppl) like there IS some sort of reason as to why they are not fucking crying every night (starting to sound dramatic 'ere. sorry!). that bullsghit just doesn't seem right to me, then again who am I to say who desurves punishment right?
notbrock
#255   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #250 by killshotReply
it's like having a child. you want them to love you and be good but also want them to be their own person (not always tho'). and then you get mad when they don't do what you want them to do and blah blah. see god as a give-'em-space dad and it makes a little more sence. still pisses me off though.

And;
"I guess this whole argument boils down to why is our all loving God such a dick?"
now that's it in a nutshell!
darkarcher
Moderator
#256   Posted 2 months agoReply
notbrock, please make multiple responses in a single post. Next time I will go through and censor the rest.
agrajagthetesty
#257   Posted 2 months agoReply
i didn't mean in hope that it'll all get better on earth! i was talking about afterlife.
So rather than "Atheists have no hope", what you meant was "Atheists don't believe in an afterlife and therefore have no hope"? Well, this is certainly true. But when you think about it, how desirable is eternity really? Imagine living for 100,000,000 years... and then 100,000,000 after that... and then 100,000,000 after that... Wouldn't you get hideously bored, bitter, frustrated and all the rest of it? No matter how good we feel or how much fun we're having, eventually it will get old. That's human nature. So while no, I don't believe in an afterlife, I personally am rather glad for it.

Besides, doesn't the idea of being mortal and having no second chance only make this life all the more relevant?
Why is our all loving God such a dick?
Nicely put.
Zairak
#258   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #257 by agrajagthetestyReply
So rather than "Atheists have no hope", what you meant was "Atheists don't believe in an afterlife and therefore have no hope"? Well, this is certainly true. But when you think about it, how desirable is eternity really? Imagine living for 100,000,000 years... and then 100,000,000 after that... and then 100,000,000 after that... Wouldn't you get hideously bored, bitter, frustrated and all the rest of it? No matter how good we feel or how much fun we're having, eventually it will get old. That's human nature. So while no, I don't believe in an afterlife, I personally am rather glad for it.
...Wow, that...Wow. You are ok with the idea of not existing? I mean, don't get me wrong, I don't believe there is going to be an existance after death either, but I also find that idea rather depressing. Personally, I would be satisfied with any form of afterlife, so long as my consciousness remains, be it Heaven, Hell or endless white void. Also, how is it human nature? I'm not really trying to dispute you here, I am honestly curious about this.

@Notbrock: I suppouse I understand you better now. Still, so what if it is emotional pain? That, even more than physical pain, relies only on the importance you assign it. Also, I put quotation marks around suffering to indicate disdain of the term. From my viewpoint, it is foolish to allow trivial things to upset your existance.
killshot
#259   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #256 by darkarcherReply
I haven't seen you in a serious debate ever since you became a moderator. I think that title they gave you is making you take shit too seriously.

@ agrajagthetesy: Although I do think the brevity of human life makes it all the more beautiful, I have to agree with Zairak. There is more to do on this planet than anyone could accomplish in a thousand lifetimes. It makes me sad to know that I will die without doing most of the things I wanted to do, but I still don't cling to the hope that I will be swept away to a magical kingdom of happiness when I am dead. I would be quite satisfied to live forever, reading every book, watching every movie, traveling everywhere on the planet till the end of time. Even if only my consciousness remained I would prefer existence over nothingness.
darkarcher
Moderator
#260   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #259 by killshotReply
That's not really the reason. I have mostly stopped posting in these topics after I realized that I prefer a one-on-one debate on more serious topics as opposed to a group debate.

I would go on, but that would send the thread off-topic, so I'll just let you all continue.
notbrock
#261   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #256 by darkarcherReply
kay
notbrock
#262   Posted 2 months agoReply
hear hear! no reason in not believing in a afterlife. make something up if it suits you but, um, nothingness seems pretty boring to me. but then again what TRULY is nothingness? i don't want a picture perfect world that's so totally boring you start feeling like it's hell (that's if you believe in hell)!
speaking of hell it's said that hell is different for each person. for example if i were to go to hell i'd find my self in a room full of people nagging my ears off (i like my solitude thanks). bit of random information for you there.
also, everyone, keep in consideration we wont BE humans when we die. we'll be ... well something. i think that some atheists can't see anything from what they know and therefore just gave up on the idea (SOME, heed that word, SOME atheists! usually it goes much deeper than that ...).
and now: if pain is only a figure of the mind ... then why does it hurt . there isn't a lot of people who can control their emotions without turning into a stone out there. your body can heal but you'll always remember distress
Zairak
#263   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #262 by notbrockReply
Nothingness would not be boring, it wouldn't be... There is no reason to wonder what nothingness truly is, it's quite obvious. It isn't. It isn't anything. Not that difficult to understand, really. It may seem hard to understand because you can't imagine what it would feel like, but that's because there would be nothing to feel. Simple as that.

Also, who said Hell would be different for each person? Revelations was quite clear on this point. After Satan is defeated, he and all of his followers would be cast into the lake of fire to burn for eternity. You are probably thinking more along the lines of Greek mythology. Hades and all that.

I never said it was a figure of the mind, I said it only had as much importance to you as you give it. It hurts because your body is telling you something is wrong. It doesn't mean that the sensation of pain is bad, but rather that the message it conveys is bad. To say that pain is bad is like beheading the messenger when he tells you your army is getting trounced.
agrajagthetesty
#264   Posted 2 months agoReply
Hmm, I seem to have caused some controversy. Perhaps I'm just weird or something, but as anything you fail to achieve in this life cannot be achieved in the next due to its being a totally different world, I'd rather not have my consciousness stretch on endlessly for all eternity. I mean, imagine if you die with regrets, or in terrible pain. You wouldn't be able to fix any mistakes you'd made- maybe the physical pain would go away, but you'd have no way of communicating with those you left behind, even if you were able to watch them. You'd be stuck somewhere you have no control over, endlessly tortured with the thought of your earthly life being over, and yet you wouldn't be able to do anything about it. To me that sounds absolutely hideous- or am I just being morbid?
Also, how is it human nature? I'm not really trying to dispute you here, I am honestly curious about this.
Well, it's human nature to fight against change, but I also tend to find that everything gets old. Perhaps I was generalizing a bit... It's just that from my experience, no matter how much I love something, over time I start to get tired of it. Favourite foods, favourite films, favourite places... they all become boring or at the very least lose their spark in the end. My argument was that an afterlife would be the same, and also that there's no possibility of it ever changing or ending.
No reason in not believing in a afterlife.
Apart from the lack of evidence, you mean?
darkarcher
Moderator
#265   Posted 2 months agoReply
No reason in not believing in a afterlife.
Apart from the lack of evidence, you mean?
In this case, you're addressing a moot point. Should there be an afterlife, there wouldn't be evidence anyway. It's either there or it's not, but there's nothing that tells us which is correct.
killshot
#266   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #265 by darkarcherReply
If no evidence exists then a null hypothesis is assumed. There may not be evidence of non-existence, but this in no way makes the alternative any more plausible. There is no reason to assume an afterlife exists so the logical stance is to believe that it doesn't.
Zairak
#267   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #264 by agrajagthetestyReply
Hmm, I seem to have caused some controversy. Perhaps I'm just weird or something, but as anything you fail to achieve in this life cannot be achieved in the next due to its being a totally different world, I'd rather not have my consciousness stretch on endlessly for all eternity. I mean, imagine if you die with regrets, or in terrible pain. You wouldn't be able to fix any mistakes you'd made- maybe the physical pain would go away, but you'd have no way of communicating with those you left behind, even if you were able to watch them. You'd be stuck somewhere you have no control over, endlessly tortured with the thought of your earthly life being over, and yet you wouldn't be able to do anything about it. To me that sounds absolutely hideous- or am I just being morbid?
Mmm...In light of this, I suppouse further debate on this point would be futile. For me, the experience is the thing. I am not out to get a high score, lead a perfect life, or do anything but live. It is an end unto itself for me. As for leaving others behind...Well, to be blunt, I am an extremely selfish person, as should be obvious by this point. I would simply find something else to do. But anyway, as I was saying, our disagreeance (if that is indeed a word...) seems to be on a fundamental level. You care about others, or so it would seem from your statement. I find them interesting, but not a necessity. As for not having control over anything, I can't say I see earthly life as being any different. How much control do you ultimately have?
Well, it's human nature to fight against change, but I also tend to find that everything gets old. Perhaps I was generalizing a bit... It's just that from my experience, no matter how much I love something, over time I start to get tired of it. Favourite foods, favourite films, favourite places... they all become boring or at the very least lose their spark in the end. My argument was that an afterlife would be the same, and also that there's no possibility of it ever changing or ending.
I also disagree with you on these points. I have actually put a lot of thought into 'Human nature' over the years, and my conclusion is that humans have no single nature. It varies from person to person. For example, my nature is to be extremely curious. For others, it might be to be aggressive. To say that all humans have some base nature is like saying all Africans are inferior or all Caucasian males are rascist pigs. It boils down to simple stereotyping.
agrajagthetesty
#268   Posted 2 months agoReply
There is no reason to assume an afterlife exists so the logical stance is to believe that it doesn't.
Took the words right out of my mouth.
As for not having control over anything, I can't say I see earthly life as being any different. How much control do you ultimately have?
At least enough control to be able to interact with the physical world.
I also disagree with you on these points. I have actually put a lot of thought into 'Human nature' over the years, and my conclusion is that humans have no single nature. It varies from person to person. For example, my nature is to be extremely curious. For others, it might be to be aggressive. To say that all humans have some base nature is like saying all Africans are inferior or all Caucasian males are rascist pigs. It boils down to simple stereotyping.
I must have put the point extremely clumsily indeed to merit this talking-to. I apologise.

It's possible that my opinion on the idea of an afterlife may all boil down to my skepticism over the possibility of "eternity" and "eternal bliss" even existing at all- or at least, the possibility of it being something the human mind could comprehend. I think that unless all earthly regrets disappeared, it was not possible to watch life on Earth (for fear of frustration over not being able to intervene) and yet this inability somehow didn't lead to endless curiosity and speculation, and there was no possibility of the afterlife itself becoming boring, I would not want my consciousness to continue eternally. And even if all those criteria were filled, could a consciousness in that state still be seen as my consciousness? The character traits that make me fear eternity are part of me, after all. Personally, I like to imagine the post-death experience as perpetual sleep. And sleep is something I enjoy very much.
Zairak
#269   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #268 by agrajagthetestyReply
I must have put the point extremely clumsily indeed to merit this talking-to. I apologise.
Apologising? No, no, no need for that. I didn't realize I was coming across as judgmental... Don't take anything I put on here personally, I just love to debate the point in as much depth as I can.
At least enough control to be able to interact with the physical world.
Well...I guess there is that. Point to agrajagthetesty then. But I still stand by my response to the rest of it.
It's possible that my opinion on the idea of an afterlife may all boil down to my skepticism over the possibility of "eternity" and "eternal bliss" even existing at all- or at least, the possibility of it being something the human mind could comprehend. I think that unless all earthly regrets disappeared, it was not possible to watch life on Earth (for fear of frustration over not being able to intervene) and yet this inability somehow didn't lead to endless curiosity and speculation, and there was no possibility of the afterlife itself becoming boring, I would not want my consciousness to continue eternally. And even if all those criteria were filled, could a consciousness in that state still be seen as my consciousness? The character traits that make me fear eternity are part of me, after all. Personally, I like to imagine the post-death experience as perpetual sleep. And sleep is something I enjoy very much.
Hmm...This is an interesting response. I can't dispute it, under the circumstances. I think this highlights an interesting aspect of people, actually. My idea of bliss seems to be your idea of Hell. This is almost certainly the only reason I still associate with people. Definitely the only one I can currently think of. They have such a diverse array of viewpoints, it's so interesting! I do, however, have a question about the perpetual sleep idea. Are you speaking of a dreamless sleep, or one in which you have one dream after another?

I apologise if I seem it seemed like I was berating you, it's just that I haven't found anybody else who is actually happy with the idea of not existing. Naturally I would try to learn more about why you would hold such a viewpoint.
agrajagthetesty
#270   Posted 2 months ago, in reply to post #269 by ZairakReply
Thanks for being civil. I'm happy that this thread has kept a good atmosphere.
My idea of bliss seems to be your idea of Hell.
Perhaps you could expand on this by explaining more about your idea of bliss?
Are you speaking of a dreamless sleep, or one in which you have one dream after another?
Well, either would be fine by me, but I think that a dreamless sleep would be both more likely and more restful.
I apologise if I seem it seemed like I was berating you, it's just that I haven't found anybody else who is actually happy with the idea of not existing. Naturally I would try to learn more about why you would hold such a viewpoint.
I didn't feel berated as such, but it did seem as if you were offended or annoyed by what I said. I think perhaps I ought to clarify a little further: it's not that I look forward to death, or that I don't try my best to avoid it. It's simply that after thinking about it, I've decided that I would prefer oblivion to eternal life.
[ Previous ][ 1 ] ... [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] ... [ 15 ] [ Next ]

Add Post

You must login before you can post. If you don't have an account, please register with us.

Yu-Gi-Oh is the property of Konami and Kazuki Takahashi. We are only a parody, we are not breaking any laws nor intend to. See our disclaimer and terms of use. You can also contact us. Maybe you even want to read our about us page. Smileys by David Lanham. Hosted by MagickSoft.